Links
to elsewhere on this Web site: /apologetics.html /book.html /doctrinal.html /essays.html /links.html /sermonettes.html /webmaster.html For
the home page, click here: /index.html
Is the theory of evolution true? /Apologeticshtml/Darwins God Review.htm
Why does God Allow Evil? Click here: /Apologeticshtml/Why Does God Allow Evil 0908.htm
Is Christian teaching from ancient paganism? /Bookhtml/Paganism influence issue article Journal
013003.htm
Which is right?: Judaism or Christianity? /Apologeticshtml/Is Christianity a Fraud vs Conder Round
1.htm
/Apologeticshtml/Is Christianity a Fraud vs Conder Round
2.htm
Should God’s existence be proven? /Apologeticshtml/Should the Bible and God Be Proven
Fideism vs WCG.htm
Does the Bible teach blind faith? /doctrinalhtml/Gospel of John Theory of Knowledge.htm
Does Islam cause terrorism? /Apologeticshtml/Moral Equivalency Applied Islamic History
0409.htm
Is the Holy Spirit a Person?
By Eric V. Snow
Is the Holy
Spirit a Divine Person who is God? Is
the doctrine of the Trinity correct to assert this teaching? In actuality, the Holy Spirit doesn’t have a
separate center of consciousness from the Father and the Son, but these two
members of the Godhead act through the Holy Spirit and are present through the
universe through the Holy Spirit. That’s one reason why at times the
Spirit may appear to be a person. Consider this interesting text
that effectively equates the Holy Spirit with Jesus (II
Cor. 3:17-18): “Now the Lord is the Spirit; and where the
Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. . . . just as from the
Lord, the Spirit.” Furthermore, when the Holy Spirit is in a
Christian, the Spirit is “Christ in you, the hope of glory” (Col. 1:27; cf.
Romans 8:10). This is how someone could lie to the Holy Spirit,
since they were lying to Jesus, who was in the Apostle Peter. (See
Acts 5:3-4). The same goes for how the Holy Spirit can be
blasphemed. The Holy Spirit is the agency through which God, the
Father and the Son, act, much like the human mind acts through its hands and
feet. The burden of proof is on the Trinitarians to show that the
Son and the Holy Spirit are separate divine persons since various texts can be
cited that equate the two.
The
personhood of the Holy Spirit isn’t a biblical teaching. For example,
many texts refer to the Holy Spirit impersonally. In
Acts 10:45 and I Timothy 4:14, the Holy Spirit is a
“gift.” The Spirit can be “quenched,” meaning, “put out” (I Thess. 5:19). It
can be poured out like water (Acts 2:17, 33). People are
baptized in it (Matt. 3:11). People can drink of the Spirit
(John 7:37-39). They can partake of it (Hebrews 6:4) and be filled
with it (Eph. 5:18; Acts 2:4). It also renews us (Titus
3:5). If it is a person and active, why would it need to be stirred
up? (II Timothy 1:6). It also has designations applied to
it, such as (in Ephesians 1:13-14, 17) its being “the guarantee of our
inheritance,” “the Holy Spirit of promise,” and “the spirit of wisdom and
revelation,” which show that it isn’t a person. Unlike the Father
and Son, who are represented in forms and shapes like that of men, the Holy
Spirit is frequently represented symbolically. The Spirit is
compared to breath (John 10:22), oil (Psalm 45:7; cf. Acts 10:38;
Matt. 25:1-10), a dove (Matt. 3:16), wind (Acts 2:2), fire (Acts 2:3), and
a down payment on eternal life (Ephesians 1:13-14; 2 Cor. 1:22;
5:5). So if the Holy Spirit is a person, why does Scripture so often
refer to it impersonally, unlike the case for the Father and the Son?
The various
cases in which the Holy Spirit is said to do this or that personal activity are
examples of personification. After all, we wouldn’t say that Abel’s
blood literally called out from the ground (Genesis 4:10),
right? We certainly don’t believe that wisdom literally cries out
with an audible voice (Proverbs 1:20-21). The valleys shout for
joy and sing in Psalm 65:13. According to Isaiah 14:8, the cedar
trees talk and the cypress trees rejoice. In Hababkkuk 2:11,
the timbers and stones are said to speak to each other. In Matt.
11:19, wisdom is said to have children. Righteousness speaks in
Romans 10:6. Obviously we have figurative language used in these
texts. The same principle applies to the cases in which the Holy
Spirit is described in a personal manner, including in John 14-16.
The
Holy Spirit has no separate consciousness separate from the Father and the
Son. Rather, the Holy Spirit is the power or force of God (Luke 1:35; I
Cor. 2:4; Acts 1:8; compare Romans 15:13, 19, and Acts 6:5 with verse
8). Paul in Eph. 3:16 desires that Christians “be strengthened with
power through His Spirit in the inner man.” The Holy Spirit
gave spiritual power to Jesus and the disciples (Luke 4:14; Acts
1:8). Power and the Spirit are equated in Acts
10:38: “God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with
power.” Furthermore,
rarely is the Holy Spirit referred to in the introductions and conclusions to
the letters where the writers mention the Father and the Son. No songs,
prayers or exclamations directed to the Spirit in the Bible, unlike the case
for the Father and the Son. Furthermore, since the Holy Spirit was the
means by which the Virgin Mary was impregnated, “He” would be the “Father” of
Jesus instead of the Father, if “He” were a separate divine person (Matt. 1:18,
20; Luke 1:34-35). So then, the Spirit was the agency or power
through which the Father sired Jesus as His Son. It isn’t a separate
person or being from them.
The Holy Spirit
is never described as a personage in any of the heavenly scenes found in the
Book of Revelation. The seven spirits shouldn’t be seen as the third
member of the Godhead of the Trinity teaching. “The Holy Spirit” is never
personified in any of the throne room scenes described in the Book of
Revelation, which is one of the best arguments against its being a separate
member of the Godhead. Even if someone believes in that teaching,
wouldn’t it be peculiar to imagine one member of the Godhead being seven
separate “Spirits” (Revelation 4:6), right? That’s a poor way to claim
that the Holy Spirit has a presence in heaven as a consciously separate Divine
entity from the Father and Son.
In order to
show that the seven spirits of Revelation aren’t references to a purported
third member of the Godhead, let’s begin by looking at Revelation 4:6 more
closely: "Seven lamps of fire were burning before the throne,
which are the seven Spirits of God." Likewise, consider Rev. 15:1:
"Then I saw another sign in heaven, great and marvelous: seven
angels having the seven last plagues, for in them the wrath of God is
complete." Now, these seven spirits stand before God's throne,
according to Rev. 1:4. Also notice how the seven stars are the seven
angels in Rev. 1:20: "As for the mystery of the seven stars which
you saw in my right hand, and the seven golden lampstands, the seven stars are
the angels of the seven churches and the seven lampstands are the seven
churches.” In Revelation 3:1, Jesus equates the seven spirits with the
seven angels when we compared Rev. 1:20 with this statement: "And to
the angel of the church in Sardis write: 'The words of him who has
the seven spirits of God and the seven stars. "'I know your works; you
have the name of being alive, and you are dead.’” In the next two
chapters of Revelation, one angel corresponds with each church Jesus
specifically wrote a letter to.
Angels are
messengers for God, for the very word translated “angel” means “messenger” in
Greek and also Hebrew. The seven spirits shouldn’t be seen as the third
member of the Godhead of the Trinity teaching. “The Holy Spirit” is never
personified in any of the throne room scenes described in the Book of
Revelation, which is one of the best arguments against its being a separate
member of the Godhead, unlike the case for the Father and the
Son. Even if we believe in that teaching, wouldn’t it be peculiar to
imagine one member of the Godhead being seven separate “Spirits,” right?
The
texts describing the Holy Spirit in John 14-16 are commonly cited to prove that
it is a “he.” However, Greek is a language that uses nouns with
assigned genders, much like Spanish, French, and German. The word
translated “Comforter” or “Helper” happens to be masculine. But
grammatical agreement between a noun and pronouns doesn’t prove the Holy Spirit
is any more a person than a feminine pronoun referring to a “silla” in Spanish
proves that a chair is a real woman. In addition, Jesus told the
disciples, and they responded back, that figurative language had been used
during the conversation between them on the night before His crucifixion
(John 16:25, 29). Interestingly enough, the word in Greek
translated “Spirit” is a neuter word, which may have contributed to why even
the Trinitarian translators of the King James Version used the word “itself” to
refer to the Holy Spirit in Romans 8:16, 26.
The earliest
Catholic writers didn’t have a clearly orthodox Trinitarian view of the Holy
Spirit. For example, Justin Martyr, one of the earliest
Catholic writers (he died in the second century A.D.), often referred to the
Holy Spirit as if it were a force or something impersonal, not as a
person. This may be why, interestingly enough, the original Nicene
declaration of 325 A.D. merely asserted they believed "in the Holy
Spirit," saying nothing about its nature. Only later on was
that creed rewritten, and the detailed description of the Holy Spirit’s being a
person was added.
So above the
evidence for the Holy Spirit being a person was reviewed and found
wanting. The Holy Spirit doesn’t have a
separate consciousness from the Father and the Son’s. The Holy Spirit is the power of God through which the Father and
the Son act. So we should reject the
doctrine of the Trinity as well as the personhood of the Holy Spirit as
unbiblical teachings.
Click here to
access essays that defend Christianity: /apologetics.html
Click here
to access essays that explain Christian teachings: /doctrinal.html
Click
here to access notes for sermonettes: /sermonettes.html
Does Islam
cause terrorism? Click here: /Apologeticshtml/Moral Equivalency Applied Islamic History
0409.htm
Is the Bible
God’s Word? Click here: /Apologeticshtml/Is the Bible the Word of God.htm
Why does God
Allow Evil? Click here: /Apologeticshtml/Why Does God Allow Evil 0908.htm
Is Christian
teaching from ancient paganism? /Bookhtml/Paganism influence issue article Journal
013003.htm
Which is
right?: Judaism or Christianity? /Apologeticshtml/Is Christianity a Fraud vs Conder Round
1.htm
/Apologeticshtml/Is Christianity a Fraud vs Conder Round
2.htm
Should God’s
existence be proven? /Apologeticshtml/Should the Bible and God Be Proven
Fideism vs WCG.htm
Does the Bible
teach blind faith? Click here: /doctrinalhtml/Gospel of John Theory of Knowledge.htm
Links to
elsewhere on this Web site: /apologetics.html /book.html /doctrinal.html /essays.html /links.html /sermonettes.html /webmaster.html For
the home page, click here: /index.html